GDXD vs. GDXU
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU).
GDXD and GDXU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDXD is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. GDXU is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. Both GDXD and GDXU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDXD or GDXU.
Correlation
The correlation between GDXD and GDXU is -0.30. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
GDXD vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GDXD:
-0.74
GDXU:
0.29
GDXD:
-1.45
GDXU:
1.31
GDXD:
0.84
GDXU:
1.17
GDXD:
-0.82
GDXU:
0.54
GDXD:
-1.57
GDXU:
1.73
GDXD:
51.74%
GDXU:
28.58%
GDXD:
105.92%
GDXU:
106.21%
GDXD:
-98.77%
GDXU:
-94.39%
GDXD:
-98.68%
GDXU:
-80.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXD achieves a -76.37% return, which is significantly lower than GDXU's 129.07% return.
GDXD
-76.37%
2.27%
-69.89%
-78.42%
-68.51%
N/A
N/A
GDXU
129.07%
-18.22%
61.55%
30.31%
-10.69%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDXD vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GDXD and GDXU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDXD vs. GDXU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GDXD
GDXU
GDXD vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GDXD vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDXD nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GDXD vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXD drawdown since its inception was -98.77%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXD and GDXU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
GDXD vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) is 39.94%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a volatility of 42.65%. This indicates that GDXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...