GDXD vs. GDX
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX).
GDXD and GDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDXD is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. GDX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. It was launched on May 22, 2006. Both GDXD and GDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDXD or GDX.
Correlation
The correlation between GDXD and GDX is -0.99. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
GDXD vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GDXD:
-0.62
GDX:
0.39
GDXD:
-0.66
GDX:
0.74
GDXD:
0.93
GDX:
1.09
GDXD:
-0.62
GDX:
0.22
GDXD:
-0.96
GDX:
1.38
GDXD:
63.05%
GDX:
8.98%
GDXD:
97.14%
GDX:
31.99%
GDXD:
-97.02%
GDX:
-80.57%
GDXD:
-94.54%
GDX:
-41.78%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXD achieves a -58.74% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 11.35% return.
GDXD
-58.74%
16.81%
-29.44%
-56.72%
N/A
N/A
GDX
11.35%
-6.73%
2.46%
9.45%
6.29%
7.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDXD vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDXD vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GDXD vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDXD nor GDX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% | 0.66% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
GDXD vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXD drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXD and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GDXD vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a higher volatility of 28.99% compared to VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 9.69%. This indicates that GDXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.