OGIG vs. PFM
OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OGIG tracks the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OGIG returned -2.07%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OGIG charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.
Performance
OGIG vs. PFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 8.18% return.
OGIG
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- -6.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PFM
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
OGIG vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | -9.21% | 14.39% | 25.97% | 50.25% | -50.64% | -9.30% | 107.92% | 36.90% | -24.48% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 8.18% | 14.00% | 16.87% | 11.40% | -6.22% | 23.08% | 9.53% | 26.88% | -2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGIG and PFM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | 0.53 |
The correlation between OGIG and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OGIG vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OGIG
PFM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OGIG
PFM
Communication Services
OGIG
PFM
Consumer Cyclical
OGIG
PFM
Industrials
OGIG
PFM
Healthcare
OGIG
PFM
Real Estate
OGIG
PFM
Financial Services
OGIG
PFM
Basic Materials
OGIG
-
PFM
Consumer Defensive
OGIG
-
PFM
Energy
OGIG
-
PFM
Utilities
OGIG
-
PFM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGIG vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank
OGIG
PFM
OGIG vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OGIG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.38 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 2.78 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 11.28 | -11.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OGIG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 2.09 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.79 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
OGIG vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than PFM's maximum drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and PFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGIG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -53.21% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -7.09% | -26.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -14.50% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.79% | -17.81% | -44.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.99% | -0.23% | -24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -6.94% | -18.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.84% | 1.75% | +14.09% |
Volatility
OGIG vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that OGIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGIG | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 2.04% | +6.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 7.13% | +11.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 9.47% | +12.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.58% | 13.54% | +18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 15.21% | +15.82% |
OGIG vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OGIG has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
OGIG vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison
OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OGIG and PFM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OGIG has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs PFM's -53.21%.
On 5-year performance, PFM leads with 10.63% vs -2.07% for OGIG. On fees, OGIG is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFM has performed better with a 10.63% return vs -2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OGIG is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.
PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.
OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OGIG and 0.53% for PFM.
PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OGIG and PFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer