OGIG vs. ILCB
OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OGIG tracks the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OGIG returned -2.57%/yr vs 12.54%/yr for ILCB. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OGIG charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
OGIG vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.73% return.
OGIG
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -8.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- -2.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.27%
ILCB
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.31M | $1.30M | $1.40M | |
| $250.04K | $303.92K | $446.15K |
OGIG vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | -8.22% | 14.39% | 25.97% | 50.25% | -50.64% | -9.30% | 107.92% | 36.90% | -24.48% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.73% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGIG and ILCB is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between OGIG and ILCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OGIG vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OGIG
ILCB
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OGIG
ILCB
Communication Services
OGIG
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
OGIG
ILCB
Healthcare
OGIG
ILCB
Real Estate
OGIG
ILCB
Industrials
OGIG
ILCB
Financial Services
OGIG
ILCB
Basic Materials
OGIG
-
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
OGIG
-
ILCB
Energy
OGIG
-
ILCB
Utilities
OGIG
-
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGIG vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
OGIG
ILCB
OGIG vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OGIG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.32 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.54 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 10.74 | -11.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OGIG vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGIG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -51.53% | -14.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -9.09% | -24.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -19.05% | -14.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.79% | -25.47% | -37.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.18% | -0.12% | -24.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -6.20% | -19.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.26% | 2.15% | +16.11% |
Volatility
OGIG vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 3.90%. This indicates that OGIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGIG | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 3.90% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.17% | 10.31% | +9.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 12.99% | +11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 17.25% | +14.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 18.20% | +12.76% |
OGIG vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
OGIG has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
OGIG vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OGIG and ILCB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OGIG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to ILCB (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 12.54% vs -2.57% for OGIG. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 12.54% return vs -2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OGIG.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.
OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OGIG and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OGIG and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer