ODDS vs. GAMR
ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ODDS returned 8.53%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for GAMR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GAMR.
Performance
ODDS vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than GAMR's 4.55% return.
ODDS
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- -14.35%
- 6M
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- -12.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAMR
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 13.66%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
ODDS vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -14.35% | 16.71% | 27.61% | 25.03% | -14.96% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 4.55% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -24.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ODDS and GAMR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between ODDS and GAMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ODDS vs. GAMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ODDS
GAMR
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ODDS
GAMR
Communication Services
ODDS
GAMR
Technology
ODDS
GAMR
Basic Materials
ODDS
-
GAMR
-
Consumer Defensive
ODDS
-
GAMR
-
Energy
ODDS
-
GAMR
-
Financial Services
ODDS
-
GAMR
Healthcare
ODDS
-
GAMR
-
Industrials
ODDS
-
GAMR
-
Real Estate
ODDS
-
GAMR
-
Utilities
ODDS
-
GAMR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ODDS vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
ODDS
GAMR
ODDS vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ODDS | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | 0.97 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | 1.39 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.18 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.80 | -1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 1.84 | -2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ODDS | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | 0.97 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.58 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
ODDS vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum GAMR drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and GAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ODDS | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -55.37% | +20.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.09% | -29.36% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.09% | -29.36% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.57% | -12.89% | -15.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -22.13% | +12.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.71% | 12.81% | +6.90% |
Volatility
ODDS vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) is 4.07%, while Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that ODDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ODDS | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.86% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 17.35% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.22% | 22.36% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 24.36% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 24.27% | +0.58% |
ODDS vs. GAMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GAMR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ODDS vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than GAMR's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 2.84% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ODDS and GAMR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMR has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to ODDS (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs GAMR's -55.37%.
On 3-year performance, GAMR leads with 16.45% vs 8.53% for ODDS. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ODDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ODDS.
ODDS has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.
ODDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while GAMR is Gaming. ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.59% for GAMR.
GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ODDS and GAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer