PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ODDS vs. FGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ODDS vs. FGD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ODDS returned 8.02%/yr vs 22.51%/yr for FGD. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FGD.

Performance

ODDS vs. FGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -13.22% return, which is significantly lower than FGD's 12.92% return.

ODDS

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.32%
YTD
-13.22%
6M
-14.15%
1Y
-12.50%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FGD

1D
0.35%
1M
1.25%
YTD
12.92%
6M
13.97%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
22.51%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ODDS vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF		-13.22%16.71%27.61%25.03%-15.18%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund		12.92%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ODDS and FGD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.61

The correlation between ODDS and FGD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ODDS vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ODDS
FGD

Consumer Cyclical

49.9%
8.8%

Communication Services

44.0%
9.3%

Technology

6.1%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.2%

Energy

-

10.0%

Financial Services

-

33.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

14.3%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ODDS
49.9%
FGD
8.8%

Communication Services

ODDS
44.0%
FGD
9.3%

Technology

ODDS
6.1%
FGD
1.2%

Basic Materials

ODDS

-

FGD
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

ODDS

-

FGD
9.2%

Energy

ODDS

-

FGD
10.0%

Financial Services

ODDS

-

FGD
33.6%

Healthcare

ODDS

-

FGD

-

Industrials

ODDS

-

FGD
14.3%

Real Estate

ODDS

-

FGD
2.4%

Utilities

ODDS

-

FGD
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF

First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund

Often compared with ODDS:
ODDS vs. BETZODDS vs. ESPOODDS vs. VOOODDS vs. TIMEODDS vs. FSRPXODDS vs. SMHODDS vs. DSCGX
Often compared with FGD:
FGD vs. VYMIFGD vs. IDVFGD vs. SCHDFGD vs. DIVFGD vs. SPYDFGD vs. HYGFGD vs. SJNK

Return for Risk

ODDS vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ODDS
ODDS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ODDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ODDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ODDS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ODDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ODDS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ODDS vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ODDSFGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.68
2.48

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.82
3.37

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.45

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

3.23

-3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

11.28

-11.96

ODDS vs. FGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ODDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the FGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ODDS and FGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ODDS vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and FGD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ODDSFGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.09%

-68.05%

+32.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.09%

-9.82%

-25.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.09%

-11.50%

-23.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-28.68%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.84%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.62%

-0.44%

-27.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-12.55%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.38%

2.81%

+17.57%

Volatility

ODDS vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison

Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) at 3.57%. This indicates that ODDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ODDSFGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

3.57%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

9.98%

+6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.66%

12.81%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.85%

14.95%

+9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

18.21%

+6.64%

ODDS vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FGD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ODDS vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison

ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FGD's 5.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund		5.01%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF		0.71%2.59%0.56%0.66%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ODDS and FGD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ODDS has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to FGD (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs FGD's -68.05%.

On 3-year performance, FGD leads with 22.51% vs 8.02% for ODDS. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FGD has performed better with a 22.51% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ODDS.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.71% for ODDS.

ODDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while FGD is Global Equities. ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.59% for FGD.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ODDS and FGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer