FGD vs. IDV
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FGD tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index while IDV tracks the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGD returned 10.25%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for IDV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
FGD vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGD having a 8.77% return and IDV slightly higher at 9.00%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGD having a 10.25% annualized return and IDV not far ahead at 10.63%.
FGD
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
IDV
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 30.43%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
FGD vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 8.77% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 20.64% | -12.49% | 17.87% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 9.00% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and IDV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FGD and IDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGD vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGD
IDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
FGD
IDV
Industrials
FGD
IDV
Consumer Cyclical
FGD
IDV
Energy
FGD
IDV
Communication Services
FGD
IDV
Consumer Defensive
FGD
IDV
Basic Materials
FGD
IDV
Utilities
FGD
IDV
Real Estate
FGD
IDV
Technology
FGD
IDV
Healthcare
FGD
-
IDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
IDV
FGD vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGD | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.59 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 12.85 | -3.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGD vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, roughly equal to the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -70.14% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -8.52% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | -11.86% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -29.19% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | -42.50% | -2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -5.67% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -15.36% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.37% | +0.46% |
Volatility
FGD vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.65%, while iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 3.96% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 11.11% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 13.18% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 15.59% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 17.70% | +0.30% |
FGD vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, less than IDV's 5.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.20% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 5.45% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FGD and IDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IDV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to FGD (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs IDV's -70.14%.
On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.63% vs 10.25% for FGD. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.45%, compared with 5.20% for FGD.
FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.49% for IDV.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGD and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer