PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 9.93%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.


FGD

1D
0.06%
1M
1.04%
YTD
12.52%
6M
13.94%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
9.93%

HYG

1D
0.08%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.60%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
12.52%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.60%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and HYG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2007

0.60

The correlation between FGD and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGD vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
HYG

Financial Services

33.6%

-

Industrials

14.3%

-

Energy

10.0%

-

Communication Services

9.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%

-

Basic Materials

6.4%

-

Utilities

4.9%
99.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.4%

Technology

1.2%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

FGD
33.6%
HYG

-

Industrials

FGD
14.3%
HYG

-

Energy

FGD
10.0%
HYG

-

Communication Services

FGD
9.3%
HYG

-

Consumer Defensive

FGD
9.2%
HYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
8.8%
HYG

-

Basic Materials

FGD
6.4%
HYG

-

Utilities

FGD
4.9%
HYG
99.6%

Real Estate

FGD
2.4%
HYG
0.4%

Technology

FGD
1.2%
HYG

-

Healthcare

FGD

-

HYG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDHYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

1.85

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

2.80

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.36

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.99

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.02

13.22

-0.20

FGD vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.85

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.52

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.46

-0.20

Drawdowns

FGD vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-34.25%

-33.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-2.34%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-4.56%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-15.79%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-22.03%

-22.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.00%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-3.24%

-9.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

0.53%

+2.25%

Volatility

FGD vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.22%. This indicates that FGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

1.22%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

3.00%

+6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

3.79%

+8.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

7.52%

+7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

8.29%

+9.94%

FGD vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGD vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.03%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.90%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and HYG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGD has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to HYG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 10-year performance, FGD leads with 9.93% vs 4.97% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FGD has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 5.03% for FGD.

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.49% for HYG.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer