PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. DIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. DIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 9.93%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.10% annualized return.


FGD

1D
0.06%
1M
1.04%
YTD
12.52%
6M
13.94%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
9.93%

DIV

1D
0.47%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
13.20%
6M
12.34%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
4.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
12.52%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
13.20%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and DIV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013

0.69

The correlation between FGD and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGD vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
DIV

Financial Services

33.6%
3.9%

Industrials

14.3%
11.5%

Energy

10.0%
21.5%

Communication Services

9.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.6%

Utilities

4.9%
12.0%

Real Estate

2.4%
19.8%

Technology

1.2%

-

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Financial Services

FGD
33.6%
DIV
3.9%

Industrials

FGD
14.3%
DIV
11.5%

Energy

FGD
10.0%
DIV
21.5%

Communication Services

FGD
9.3%
DIV
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

FGD
9.2%
DIV
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
8.8%
DIV
3.5%

Basic Materials

FGD
6.4%
DIV
4.6%

Utilities

FGD
4.9%
DIV
12.0%

Real Estate

FGD
2.4%
DIV
19.8%

Technology

FGD
1.2%
DIV

-

Healthcare

FGD

-

DIV
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

1.63

+1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

2.35

+1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.28

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.21

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.02

9.11

+3.91

FGD vs. DIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the DIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and DIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.63

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.39

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.23

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.28

-0.02

Drawdowns

FGD vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and DIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-52.74%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-5.23%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-12.33%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-21.14%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-52.74%

+7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.84%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-7.03%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.84%

+0.94%

Volatility

FGD vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.02%. This indicates that FGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.02%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

6.96%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

10.25%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

13.67%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

17.98%

+0.25%

FGD vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGD vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than DIV's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.67%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.03%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and DIV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGD has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to DIV (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs DIV's -52.74%.

On 10-year performance, FGD leads with 9.93% vs 4.10% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FGD has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 4.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 5.03% for FGD.

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while DIV is Dividend. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.45% for DIV.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and DIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer