PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OALC vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OALC vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OALC vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
-2.28%20.36%19.64%22.03%-18.08%-0.54%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
-4.86%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%1.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's -4.86% return.


OALC

1D
1.08%
1M
-3.94%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10Y*

MGC

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OALC vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OALC vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OALC
OALC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OALC vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OALCMGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.01

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

1.56

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.64

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.46

7.19

+2.28

OALC vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OALC Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OALC and MGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OALCMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.01

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.56

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between OALC and MGC is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OALC vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than MGC's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
0.62%0.61%0.70%0.40%0.40%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
1.01%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Drawdowns

OALC vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and MGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OALCMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-51.93%

+25.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-11.93%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-6.33%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-7.12%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.72%

-0.40%

Volatility

OALC vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OALCMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

5.54%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

9.86%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

18.80%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

17.26%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

18.19%

-0.78%