PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OALC vs. OAEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OALC vs. OAEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OALC vs. OAEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
-3.32%20.36%19.64%22.03%3.21%
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
10.06%26.67%0.43%17.97%1.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than OAEM's 10.06% return.


OALC

1D
2.70%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
10Y*

OAEM

1D
4.31%
1M
-10.94%
YTD
10.06%
6M
18.04%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OALC vs. OAEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OAEM's 1.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OALC vs. OAEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OALC
OALC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

OAEM
OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OALC vs. OAEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OALCOAEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

1.86

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

2.48

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.78

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.19

12.06

-2.87

OALC vs. OAEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OALC Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the OAEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OALC and OAEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OALCOAEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.86

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between OALC and OAEM is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OALC vs. OAEM - Dividend Comparison

OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than OAEM's 0.70% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
0.63%0.61%0.70%0.40%0.40%0.06%
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
0.70%0.77%0.91%1.63%0.04%0.00%

Drawdowns

OALC vs. OAEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than OAEM's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and OAEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OALCOAEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-17.05%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-14.63%

+3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-10.94%

+4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-3.94%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.38%

-1.08%

Volatility

OALC vs. OAEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is 5.58%, while OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a volatility of 13.45%. This indicates that OALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OAEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OALCOAEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

13.45%

-7.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

17.65%

-7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

22.39%

-4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

19.00%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

19.00%

-1.59%