OALC vs. FTGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS).

OALC and FTGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OALC is an actively managed fund by Oneascent. It was launched on Nov 15, 2021. FTGS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the The Growth Strength Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 25, 2022.

Performance

OALC vs. FTGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OALC vs. FTGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF	-3.32%	20.36%	19.64%	22.03%	4.99%
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF	-3.69%	12.78%	15.76%	33.69%	1.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly higher than FTGS's -3.69% return.

OALC

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: -3.32%
• 6M: -0.95%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTGS

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -3.69%
• 6M: -5.18%
• 1Y: 14.55%
• 3Y*: 15.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OALC vs. FTGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGS's 0.60% expense ratio.

FTGS

First Trust Growth Strength ETF

OALC

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF

Return for Risk

OALC vs. FTGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OALC

OALC Risk / Return Rank: 71
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FTGS

FTGS Risk / Return Rank: 47
FTGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FTGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FTGS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FTGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FTGS Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OALC vs. FTGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OALC	FTGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	0.74	+0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.21	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.17	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.28	+0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.19	4.84	+4.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OALC vs. FTGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OALC Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the FTGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OALC and FTGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OALC	FTGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	0.74	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.97	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between OALC and FTGS is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

OALC vs. FTGS - Dividend Comparison

OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than FTGS's 0.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF	0.63%	0.61%	0.70%	0.40%	0.40%	0.06%
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF	0.10%	0.16%	0.39%	0.62%	0.21%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OALC vs. FTGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than FTGS's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and FTGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OALC	FTGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-19.99%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-11.83%	+0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.95%	-6.92%	+0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.29%	-2.80%	-4.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.12%	-0.82%

Volatility

OALC vs. FTGS - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OALC	FTGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	5.51%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.09%	10.24%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.88%	19.62%	-1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.41%	17.33%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	17.33%	+0.08%