OAKGX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
OAKGX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Aug 3, 1999. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
OAKGX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OAKGX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKGX Oakmark Global Fund | -5.09% | 21.19% | 2.53% | 17.36% | -16.86% | 30.47% | 9.00% | 29.66% | -19.02% | 27.05% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKGX achieves a -5.09% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, OAKGX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 9.55%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
OAKGX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- -5.09%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 9.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OAKGX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OAKGX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKGX
FGIAX
OAKGX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 1.79 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 2.30 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 2.73 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 12.62 | -9.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.79 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.80 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.42 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKGX and FGIAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OAKGX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
OAKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKGX Oakmark Global Fund | 1.17% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 4.35% | 0.75% | 17.98% | 0.16% | 3.71% | 14.80% | 7.50% | 1.07% | 2.87% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
OAKGX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKGX drawdown since its inception was -60.43%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKGX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.43% | -49.35% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -8.29% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.54% | -21.08% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.14% | -38.02% | -7.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -3.06% | -5.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -7.22% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.79% | +1.77% |
Volatility
OAKGX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that OAKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OAKGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 4.15% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 7.07% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 12.28% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 13.08% | +5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.66% | 15.17% | +5.49% |