OAKGX vs. IHF
Compare and contrast key facts about Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF).
OAKGX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Aug 3, 1999. IHF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006.
Performance
OAKGX vs. IHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OAKGX vs. IHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKGX Oakmark Global Fund | -5.60% | 21.19% | 2.53% | 17.36% | -16.86% | 30.47% | 9.00% | 29.66% | -19.02% | 27.05% |
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | -11.80% | 0.92% | -7.90% | -1.11% | -7.11% | 24.46% | 17.67% | 22.34% | 9.56% | 25.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKGX achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly higher than IHF's -11.80% return. Over the past 10 years, OAKGX has outperformed IHF with an annualized return of 9.49%, while IHF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.59% annualized return.
OAKGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 9.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
IHF
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 6M
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- -19.13%
- 3Y*
- -4.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OAKGX vs. IHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than IHF's 0.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OAKGX vs. IHF — Risk / Return Rank
OAKGX
IHF
OAKGX vs. IHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKGX | IHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | -0.79 | +1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | -0.91 | +1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.87 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.77 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | -1.40 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKGX | IHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | -0.79 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.14 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.32 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.34 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKGX and IHF is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
OAKGX vs. IHF - Dividend Comparison
OAKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than IHF's 1.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKGX Oakmark Global Fund | 1.17% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 4.35% | 0.75% | 17.98% | 0.16% | 3.71% | 14.80% | 7.50% | 1.07% | 2.87% |
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 1.26% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
OAKGX vs. IHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKGX drawdown since its inception was -60.43%, roughly equal to the maximum IHF drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKGX and IHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKGX | IHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.43% | -58.42% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -25.16% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.54% | -29.85% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.14% | -35.23% | -9.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.49% | -26.81% | +17.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -10.59% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 13.78% | -10.27% |
Volatility
OAKGX vs. IHF - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OAKGX | IHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 5.01% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 15.73% | -5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 24.20% | -6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 18.90% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 20.94% | -0.27% |