NYT vs. BAC
NYT (The New York Times Company) and BAC (Bank of America Corporation) are both stocks. NYT operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, NYT returned 20.92%/yr vs 18.70%/yr for BAC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NYT vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYT achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, NYT has outperformed BAC with an annualized return of 20.92%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively lower 18.70% annualized return.
NYT
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 33.85%
- 3Y*
- 25.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.92%
BAC
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- 12.15%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 18.70%
NYT vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYT The New York Times Company | 4.39% | 35.06% | 7.33% | 52.60% | -32.16% | -6.18% | 61.92% | 45.26% | 21.35% | 40.50% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 6.22% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYT and BAC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1986 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NYT and BAC has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NYT:
$11.80B
BAC:
$425.54B
NYT:
$2.33
BAC:
$4.19
NYT:
30.96
BAC:
13.68
NYT:
2.07
BAC:
5.49
NYT:
4.08
BAC:
2.48
NYT:
5.90
BAC:
1.54
NYT:
$2.90B
BAC:
$174.85B
NYT:
$1.49B
BAC:
$110.47B
NYT:
$573.11M
BAC:
$41.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYT vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
NYT
BAC
NYT vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New York Times Company (NYT) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYT | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.67 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 4.29 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYT vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYT drawdown since its inception was -92.09%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYT and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYT | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.09% | -93.10% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | -17.93% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -27.51% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.83% | -46.64% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.93% | -48.95% | -0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.05% | 0.00% | -16.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.17% | -28.28% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 6.96% | -0.51% |
Volatility
NYT vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
The New York Times Company (NYT) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC) have volatilities of 6.01% and 5.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYT | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 5.85% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.61% | 16.71% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 21.69% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 26.81% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 30.69% | +0.06% |
Dividends
NYT vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
NYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than BAC's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.65% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
NYT The New York Times Company | 1.07% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.56% | 0.44% | 0.59% | 0.72% | 0.86% | 1.20% | 1.19% |
Financials
NYT vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The New York Times Company and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NYT vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison
NYT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 349.30M and revenue of 712.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
BAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.
NYT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 90.62M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
BAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.
NYT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 87.92M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
BAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NYT and BAC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NYT has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to BAC (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYT dropped -92.09% vs BAC's -93.10%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NYT and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer