PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYT vs. NWSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NYT vs. NWSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The New York Times Company (NYT) and News Corporation (NWSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYT achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly higher than NWSA's -3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, NYT has outperformed NWSA with an annualized return of 20.77%, while NWSA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


NYT

1D
-2.21%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
3.14%
6M
0.83%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
20.77%

NWSA

1D
1.00%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-3.00%
6M
-4.18%
1Y
-13.09%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYT vs. NWSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NYT
The New York Times Company
3.14%35.06%7.33%52.60%-32.16%-6.18%61.92%45.26%21.35%40.50%
NWSA
News Corporation
-3.00%-4.48%13.03%36.41%-17.57%25.20%29.20%26.42%-28.99%43.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NYT and NWSA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2013

0.45

The correlation between NYT and NWSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NYT:

$11.66B

NWSA:

$14.17B

EPS

NYT:

$2.33

NWSA:

$2.97

PE Ratio

NYT:

30.59

NWSA:

8.50

PEG Ratio

NYT:

2.05

NWSA:

0.08

PS Ratio

NYT:

4.03

NWSA:

1.59

PB Ratio

NYT:

5.83

NWSA:

1.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

NYT:

$2.90B

NWSA:

$9.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NYT:

$1.49B

NWSA:

$3.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

NYT:

$573.11M

NWSA:

$951.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYT vs. NWSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYT
NYT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NWSA
NWSA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NWSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NWSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWSA Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYT vs. NWSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New York Times Company (NYT) and News Corporation (NWSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NYTNWSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.93

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

-0.47

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

-0.87

+5.66

NYT vs. NWSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the NWSA Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NYT and NWSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NYT vs. NWSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYT drawdown since its inception was -92.09%, which is greater than NWSA's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYT and NWSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYTNWSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.09%

-51.91%

-40.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.05%

-27.81%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-27.81%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

-41.94%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.93%

-50.63%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.05%

-18.35%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.17%

-18.27%

-13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

15.03%

-8.42%

Volatility

NYT vs. NWSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The New York Times Company (NYT) is 6.38%, while News Corporation (NWSA) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that NYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYTNWSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

7.99%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

18.66%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.88%

24.56%

+4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.44%

27.25%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.75%

29.37%

+1.38%

Dividends

NYT vs. NWSA - Dividend Comparison

NYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than NWSA's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWSA
News Corporation
0.79%0.77%0.73%0.81%1.10%0.90%1.11%1.41%1.76%1.23%1.75%0.75%
NYT
The New York Times Company
1.08%0.97%0.96%0.86%1.05%0.56%0.44%0.59%0.72%0.86%1.20%1.19%

Financials

NYT vs. NWSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The New York Times Company and News Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
712.24M
2.19B
(NYT) Total Revenue
(NWSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NYT and NWSA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWSA has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to NYT (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYT dropped -92.09% vs NWSA's -51.91%.

NYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYT and NWSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer