NYT vs. NRG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The New York Times Company (NYT) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG).

Performance

NYT vs. NRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The New York Times Company (NYT) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NYT vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NYT The New York Times Company	23.66%	35.06%	7.33%	52.60%	-32.16%	-6.18%	61.92%	45.26%	21.35%	40.50%
NRG NRG Energy, Inc.	-5.57%	78.91%	78.58%	69.36%	-23.47%	18.54%	-2.14%	0.69%	39.59%	133.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NYT : $14.04B NRG : $29.83B
EPS NYT : $2.09 NRG : $4.39
PE Ratio NYT : 40.81 NRG : 34.12
PEG Ratio NYT : 2.73 NRG : 0.51
PB Ratio NYT : 6.88 NRG : 28.93
Total Revenue (TTM) NYT : $2.82B NRG : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) NYT : $1.44B NRG : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) NYT : $541.86M NRG : $1.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYT achieves a 23.66% return, which is significantly higher than NRG's -5.57% return. Over the past 10 years, NYT has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 22.08%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 30.57% annualized return.

NYT

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: 23.66%
• 6M: 54.68%
• 1Y: 72.29%
• 3Y*: 31.57%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: 22.08%

NRG

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -14.63%
• YTD: -5.57%
• 6M: -6.89%
• 1Y: 54.03%
• 3Y*: 67.36%
• 5Y*: 35.75%
• 10Y*: 30.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NYT vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYT

NYT Risk / Return Rank: 96
NYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
NYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
NYT Omega Ratio Rank: 96
NYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NYT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

NRG

NRG Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYT vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New York Times Company (NYT) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NYT	NRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	1.02	+1.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	1.71	+2.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.23	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.52	2.54	+3.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.69	6.05	+10.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NYT vs. NRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NYT Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the NRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NYT and NRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NYT	NRG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	1.02	+1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.92	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.79	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.38	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between NYT and NRG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NYT vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison

NYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than NRG's 1.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NYT The New York Times Company	0.90%	0.97%	0.96%	0.86%	1.05%	0.56%	0.44%	0.59%	0.72%	0.86%	1.20%	1.19%
NRG NRG Energy, Inc.	1.20%	1.11%	1.81%	2.92%	4.40%	3.02%	3.20%	0.30%	0.30%	0.42%	1.92%	4.93%

Drawdowns

NYT vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYT drawdown since its inception was -92.09%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYT and NRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NYT	NRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.09%	-79.41%	-12.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-23.26%	+11.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.83%	-32.62%	-17.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.93%	-48.76%	-1.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.55%	+18.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.27%	-28.06%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	9.75%	-5.27%

Volatility

NYT vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The New York Times Company (NYT) is 6.19%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that NYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NYT	NRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	15.32%	-9.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.80%	32.27%	-16.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.95%	53.38%	-26.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.18%	39.08%	-9.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.50%	39.02%	-8.52%

Financials

NYT vs. NRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The New York Times Company and NRG Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NYT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 414.20M and revenue of 802.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.6%.

NRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of -4.17B and revenue of -22.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

NYT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 165.98M and revenue of 802.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

NRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 246.00M and revenue of -22.96B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.1%.

NYT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 129.84M and revenue of 802.31M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

NRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 66.00M and revenue of -22.96B, resulting in a net margin of -0.3%.