PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. TARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. TARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than TARK's -1.07% return.


NXTE

1D
-0.69%
1M
14.44%
YTD
35.18%
6M
33.52%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
10Y*

TARK

1D
5.08%
1M
7.71%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-14.79%
1Y
55.66%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
35.18%21.84%-3.42%13.85%-1.33%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-1.07%41.00%-4.85%121.37%-39.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and TARK is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022

0.80

The correlation between NXTE and TARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTETARKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.17

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

0.97

+3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

1.90

+12.74

NXTE vs. TARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the TARK Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and TARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTETARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

0.78

+1.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.06

+0.73

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum TARK drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and TARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTETARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-77.82%

+49.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-57.57%

+43.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

-65.55%

+38.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-34.90%

+33.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-50.97%

+43.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

29.39%

-25.13%

Volatility

NXTE vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) is 9.29%, while Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a volatility of 18.46%. This indicates that NXTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTETARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

18.46%

-9.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

50.18%

-30.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.52%

71.92%

-47.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.98%

90.57%

-64.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.98%

90.57%

-64.59%

NXTE vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TARK's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than TARK's 30.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.37%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
30.32%30.00%0.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and TARK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (18.46%) compared to NXTE (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs TARK's -77.82%.

On 3-year performance, TARK leads with 21.94% vs 18.45% for NXTE. On fees, NXTE is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, NXTE has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TARK has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NXTE is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while TARK is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 1.15% for TARK.

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and TARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer