NXTE vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXTE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NXTE returned 18.97%/yr vs 21.02%/yr for GABF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

NXTE vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 33.00% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -5.55% return.

NXTE

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 7.18%
• YTD: 33.00%
• 6M: 31.22%
• 1Y: 51.11%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: -5.55%
• 6M: -6.96%
• 1Y: -4.82%
• 3Y*: 21.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	33.00%	21.84%	-3.42%	13.85%	-1.52%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-5.55%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and GABF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2022	0.64

The correlation between NXTE and GABF shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NXTE vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NXTE	GABF
Technology	53.6%	5.2%
Industrials	15.7%	4.9%
Real Estate	10.1%	4.3%
Healthcare	10.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	-
Communication Services	1.6%	-
Financial Services	1.3%	85.6%
Basic Materials	0.5%	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

NXTE vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE

NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 67
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 6
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NXTE	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	-0.28	+2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	-0.26	+2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.97	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	-0.28	+4.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.56	-0.64	+12.19

NXTE vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXTE	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.64%	-20.86%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-17.16%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.24%	-20.86%	-6.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.75%	-10.19%	+4.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-4.91%	-2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	7.57%	-3.13%

Volatility

NXTE vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.53%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXTE	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.81%	4.53%	+10.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.21%	13.33%	+9.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.71%	17.49%	+10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.70%	20.48%	+6.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.70%	20.48%	+6.22%

NXTE vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXTE vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than GABF's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.08%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.52%	0.76%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXTE and GABF in my portfolio?

NXTE and GABF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NXTE or GABF?

NXTE has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to GABF (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, NXTE or GABF?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 21.02% vs 18.97% for NXTE. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NXTE or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 21.02% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXTE or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXTE or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.38% for NXTE.

What is the main difference between NXTE and GABF?

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.