NXTE vs. NVDS
NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXTE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while NVDS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%). NXTE is actively managed, while NVDS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NXTE returned 18.88%/yr vs -65.20%/yr for NVDS. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for NVDS.
Performance
NXTE vs. NVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 36.97% return, which is significantly higher than NVDS's -29.31% return.
NXTE
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 18.44%
- YTD
- 36.97%
- 6M
- 36.75%
- 1Y
- 67.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- -29.31%
- 6M
- -32.74%
- 1Y
- -58.02%
- 3Y*
- -65.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTE vs. NVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 36.97% | 21.84% | -3.42% | 13.85% | -1.33% |
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -29.31% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXTE and NVDS is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022 | -0.52 |
The correlation between NXTE and NVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.44 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXTE vs. NVDS — Risk / Return Rank
NXTE
NVDS
NXTE vs. NVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NXTE | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.76 | -1.14 | +3.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.57 | -1.91 | +5.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.79 | +0.65 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | -0.97 | +5.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.09 | -1.53 | +17.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXTE | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | -1.14 | +3.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | -1.03 | +1.71 |
Drawdowns
NXTE vs. NVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum NVDS drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and NVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXTE | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.64% | -99.40% | +70.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -59.88% | +46.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.24% | -96.32% | +69.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -99.35% | +99.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -83.38% | +75.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 38.60% | -34.34% |
Volatility
NXTE vs. NVDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) is 9.18%, while Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a volatility of 18.32%. This indicates that NXTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXTE | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.18% | 18.32% | -9.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 38.28% | -18.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 50.88% | -26.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.00% | 68.85% | -42.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.00% | 68.85% | -42.85% |
NXTE vs. NVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDS's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NXTE vs. NVDS - Dividend Comparison
NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than NVDS's 20.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 20.07% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXTE and NVDS have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to NXTE (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs NVDS's -99.40%.
On 3-year performance, NXTE leads with 18.88% vs -65.20% for NVDS. On fees, NXTE is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, NXTE has been the lower-risk option at 9.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NXTE has performed better with a 18.88% return vs -65.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NXTE is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 20.07%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.
NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while NVDS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 1.15% for NVDS.
NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NXTE and NVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer