PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. PPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. PPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly higher than PPI's 15.24% return.


NXTE

1D
1.06%
1M
-10.99%
6M
7.52%
YTD
17.61%
1Y
35.18%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.10%

PPI

1D
0.61%
1M
1.03%
6M
9.02%
YTD
15.24%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$194.92K$139.09K$197.37K
$736.15K$632.16K$647.65K

NXTE vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
17.61%21.84%-3.42%13.85%-1.52%
PPI
Astoria Real Assets ETF
15.24%30.05%6.43%11.33%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and PPI is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2022

0.70

The correlation between NXTE and PPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PPI
PPI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NXTE vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXTEPPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.52

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

8.81

-2.73

NXTE vs. PPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the PPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and PPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than PPI's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and PPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTEPPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-24.54%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.50%

-7.98%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

-20.70%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.95%

-4.32%

-12.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-6.44%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

3.18%

+2.62%

Volatility

NXTE vs. PPI - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) at 4.29%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTEPPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

4.29%

+6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.94%

12.36%

+13.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.28%

16.74%

+13.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.17%

18.95%

+8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

18.95%

+8.22%

NXTE vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than PPI's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.56%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%
PPI
Astoria Real Assets ETF
1.30%1.06%0.60%2.87%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and PPI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTE has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to PPI (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs PPI's -24.54%.

On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 18.72% vs 12.85% for NXTE. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

PPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.56% for NXTE.

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while PPI is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.58% for PPI.

PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and PPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer