NXTE vs. POW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXTE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

NXTE vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 22.67% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.98% return.

NXTE

• 1D: 4.31%
• 1M: -7.16%
• 6M: 12.96%
• YTD: 22.67%
• 1Y: 38.44%
• 3Y*: 14.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.33%

POW

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -5.46%
• 6M: 18.56%
• YTD: 38.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	$193.74K	$136.30K	$197.70K
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.18M	$2.14M	$2.63M

NXTE vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	22.67%	-5.70%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.98%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and POW is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

NXTE vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NXTE

NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 45
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 51

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NXTE vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NXTE	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	—	—

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, roughly equal to the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXTE	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.64%	-28.02%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.37%	-18.34%	+4.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.92%	-5.66%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NXTE	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.51%	34.48%	-3.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.24%	34.48%	-7.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.24%	34.48%	-7.24%

NXTE vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXTE vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	0.54%	0.36%	0.52%	0.76%	0.13%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXTE and POW in my portfolio?

NXTE and POW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NXTE or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXTE or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXTE or POW?

NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between NXTE and POW?

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: AXS and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.75% for POW.