NXTE vs. HDV
NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXTE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. NXTE is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NXTE returned 14.45%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for HDV. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
NXTE vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 22.67% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 19.95% return.
NXTE
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 22.67%
- 1Y
- 38.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.33%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.49M | $158.01M | $110.76M | |
| $193.74K | $136.30K | $197.70K |
NXTE vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 22.67% | 21.84% | -3.42% | 13.85% | -1.52% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 19.95% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 11.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXTE and HDV is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2022 | 0.31 |
The correlation between NXTE and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NXTE vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NXTE
HDV
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
NXTE
HDV
Industrials
NXTE
HDV
Real Estate
NXTE
HDV
-
Healthcare
NXTE
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
NXTE
HDV
Utilities
NXTE
HDV
Consumer Defensive
NXTE
HDV
Communication Services
NXTE
HDV
Basic Materials
NXTE
HDV
Financial Services
NXTE
HDV
Energy
NXTE
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXTE vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
NXTE
HDV
NXTE vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NXTE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.40 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 4.80 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 13.10 | -6.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NXTE vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXTE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.64% | -37.04% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.50% | -5.18% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.24% | -10.49% | -16.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.37% | -1.48% | -11.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -3.06% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.86% | 1.89% | +3.97% |
Volatility
NXTE vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.30%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXTE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 4.30% | +7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.27% | 8.66% | +17.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.51% | 10.81% | +19.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.24% | 12.94% | +14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.24% | 15.79% | +11.45% |
NXTE vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NXTE vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than HDV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 0.54% | 0.36% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXTE and HDV have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXTE has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to HDV (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 3-year performance, HDV leads with 15.90% vs 14.45% for NXTE. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HDV has performed better with a 15.90% return vs 14.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.54% for NXTE.
NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: AXS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NXTE and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer