NVOH vs. HDMV
NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVOH returned -36.98% vs 8.07% for HDMV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HDMV.
Performance
NVOH vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a -11.32% return, which is significantly lower than HDMV's 3.14% return.
NVOH
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- -11.32%
- 6M
- -6.21%
- 1Y
- -36.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- —
NVOH vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | -11.32% | -42.98% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 3.14% | 28.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOH and HDMV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOH vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank
NVOH
HDMV
NVOH vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVOH | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.14 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.93 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 2.83 | -3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVOH | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | 0.72 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | 0.40 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
NVOH vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than HDMV's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and HDMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOH | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -32.01% | -29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.00% | -8.73% | -44.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.33% | -7.03% | -46.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.39% | -6.77% | -31.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.29% | 2.85% | +33.44% |
Volatility
NVOH vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) at 3.36%. This indicates that NVOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOH | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 3.36% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.38% | 9.47% | +26.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.51% | 11.19% | +38.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.02% | 12.05% | +36.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.02% | 13.24% | +35.78% |
NVOH vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVOH vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison
NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than HDMV's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.75% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 3.87% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOH and HDMV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVOH has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to HDMV (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs HDMV's -32.01%.
On 1-year performance, HDMV leads with 8.07% vs -36.98% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDMV has performed better with a 8.07% return vs -36.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 3.87% for NVOH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVOH and HDMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer