PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVOH vs. HDMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVOH vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a -11.32% return, which is significantly lower than HDMV's 3.14% return.


NVOH

1D
-1.09%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
-11.32%
6M
-6.21%
1Y
-36.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDMV

1D
-1.23%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
3.14%
6M
5.60%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVOH vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVOH and HDMV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVOH vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVOH
NVOH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NVOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVOH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NVOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVOH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVOH vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVOHHDMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.14

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

0.93

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

2.83

-3.85

NVOH vs. HDMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVOH Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the HDMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVOH and HDMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVOHHDMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

0.72

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

0.40

-1.18

Drawdowns

NVOH vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than HDMV's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and HDMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVOHHDMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.60%

-32.01%

-29.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.00%

-8.73%

-44.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.33%

-7.03%

-46.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.39%

-6.77%

-31.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.29%

2.85%

+33.44%

Volatility

NVOH vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison

Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) at 3.36%. This indicates that NVOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVOHHDMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

3.36%

+4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.38%

9.47%

+26.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.51%

11.19%

+38.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.02%

12.05%

+36.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.02%

13.24%

+35.78%

NVOH vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVOH vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison

NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than HDMV's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.75%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%
NVOH
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF
3.87%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVOH and HDMV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVOH has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to HDMV (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs HDMV's -32.01%.

On 1-year performance, HDMV leads with 8.07% vs -36.98% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HDMV has performed better with a 8.07% return vs -36.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 3.87% for NVOH.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.80% for HDMV.

HDMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVOH and HDMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer