NVOH vs. IDOG
NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. NVOH is actively managed, while IDOG is passively managed. Over the past year, NVOH returned -37.62% vs 35.52% for IDOG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IDOG.
Performance
NVOH vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a -13.62% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 14.02% return.
NVOH
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- 1Y
- -37.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDOG
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 35.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
NVOH vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | -13.62% | -42.98% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.02% | 38.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOH and IDOG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOH vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
NVOH
IDOG
NVOH vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVOH | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.46 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 5.51 | -6.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 19.31 | -20.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVOH | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 | 2.68 | -3.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.81 | 0.51 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
NVOH vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and IDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOH | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -37.32% | -24.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.00% | -6.47% | -46.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.54% | -0.47% | -54.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.30% | -7.93% | -30.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.09% | 1.84% | +34.25% |
Volatility
NVOH vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.13%. This indicates that NVOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOH | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 4.13% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.21% | 10.09% | +26.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.40% | 13.33% | +36.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 15.61% | +33.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 17.45% | +31.59% |
NVOH vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVOH vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than IDOG's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.42% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 3.97% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOH and IDOG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVOH has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs IDOG's -37.32%.
On 1-year performance, IDOG leads with 35.52% vs -37.62% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 35.52% return vs -37.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.
NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 3.42% for IDOG.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.50% for IDOG.
IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVOH and IDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer