NVOH vs. JHID
NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and JHID (John Hancock International High Dividend ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVOH returned -36.21% vs 33.80% for JHID. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for JHID.
Performance
NVOH vs. JHID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a -10.34% return, which is significantly lower than JHID's 13.77% return.
NVOH
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -10.34%
- 6M
- -5.34%
- 1Y
- -36.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHID
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVOH vs. JHID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | -10.34% | -42.98% |
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 13.77% | 39.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOH and JHID is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOH vs. JHID — Risk / Return Rank
NVOH
JHID
NVOH vs. JHID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVOH | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.48 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 4.03 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 15.73 | -16.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVOH | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 | 2.69 | -3.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 1.59 | -2.36 |
Drawdowns
NVOH vs. JHID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than JHID's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and JHID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOH | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -12.42% | -49.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.00% | -8.42% | -44.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.82% | -0.80% | -52.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -2.46% | -35.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.19% | 2.15% | +34.04% |
Volatility
NVOH vs. JHID - Volatility Comparison
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) at 3.90%. This indicates that NVOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOH | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 3.90% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.37% | 10.40% | +25.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.53% | 12.64% | +36.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 13.91% | +35.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 13.91% | +35.17% |
NVOH vs. JHID - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JHID's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVOH vs. JHID - Dividend Comparison
NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than JHID's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 2.86% | 3.13% | 5.15% | 5.23% |
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 3.82% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOH and JHID have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVOH has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to JHID (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs JHID's -12.42%.
On 1-year performance, JHID leads with 33.80% vs -36.21% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, JHID has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JHID has performed better with a 33.80% return vs -36.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for JHID.
NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 2.86% for JHID.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.46% for JHID.
JHID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVOH and JHID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer