NVDQ vs. ROBN

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while ROBN is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -55.07% vs -29.71% for ROBN. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.

Performance

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -38.39% return, which is significantly lower than ROBN's -27.36% return.

NVDQ

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -3.36%
• 6M: -40.41%
• YTD: -38.39%
• 1Y: -55.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROBN

• 1D: 4.19%
• 1M: 32.51%
• 6M: -34.60%
• YTD: -27.36%
• 1Y: -29.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-38.39%	-74.55%
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	-27.36%	124.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and ROBN is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	-0.51

The correlation between NVDQ and ROBN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. ROBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

ROBN

ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 10
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDQ	ROBN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	-0.21	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.05	0.65	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.08	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	-0.34	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.63	-0.51	-1.12

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the ROBN Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and ROBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, which is greater than ROBN's maximum drawdown of -86.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and ROBN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDQ	ROBN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.45%	-86.84%	-12.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.65%	-86.84%	+25.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.38%	-66.08%	-33.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.53%	-45.38%	-43.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.77%	58.38%	-24.61%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is 22.84%, while T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a volatility of 37.14%. This indicates that NVDQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDQ	ROBN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.84%	37.14%	-14.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.75%	105.20%	-49.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.32%	138.91%	-67.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.97%	150.94%	-55.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.97%	150.94%	-55.97%

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDQ and ROBN have an expense ratio of 1.05%.

Dividends

NVDQ vs. ROBN - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than ROBN's 6.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.42%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	6.17%	4.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDQ and ROBN in my portfolio?

NVDQ and ROBN have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDQ or ROBN?

ROBN has higher volatility (37.14%) compared to NVDQ (22.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs ROBN's -86.84%.

Which ETF is better, NVDQ or ROBN?

On 1-year performance, ROBN leads with -29.71% vs -55.07% for NVDQ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 22.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDQ or ROBN?

Over the 1-year period, ROBN has performed better with a -29.71% return vs -55.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDQ or ROBN?

NVDQ and ROBN have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDQ or ROBN?

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.42% for NVDQ.

What is the main difference between NVDQ and ROBN?

NVDQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ROBN is Leveraged Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROBN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.