NVDQ vs. IYW
NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while IYW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. NVDQ is actively managed, while IYW is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -52.54% vs 37.18% for IYW. At a correlation of -0.78, they often move in opposite directions. NVDQ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYW.
Performance
NVDQ vs. IYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -35.48% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's 21.62% return.
NVDQ
- 1D
- 4.73%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- -34.89%
- YTD
- -35.48%
- 1Y
- -52.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYW
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- 6M
- 21.49%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 37.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.52%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 24.97%
NVDQ vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -35.48% | -74.63% | -93.80% | -28.84% |
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 21.62% | 25.38% | 30.25% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDQ and IYW is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | -0.78 |
The correlation between NVDQ and IYW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDQ vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank
NVDQ
IYW
NVDQ vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDQ | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.28 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 2.10 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 6.49 | -8.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDQ vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, which is greater than IYW's maximum drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and IYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDQ | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.45% | -81.90% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.65% | -17.81% | -43.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -6.60% | -92.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.55% | -34.52% | -54.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.94% | 5.74% | +28.20% |
Volatility
NVDQ vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a higher volatility of 22.22% compared to iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) at 8.80%. This indicates that NVDQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDQ | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.22% | 8.80% | +13.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.98% | 19.41% | +36.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.07% | 23.09% | +47.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.96% | 26.38% | +68.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.96% | 25.29% | +69.67% |
NVDQ vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDQ vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison
NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than IYW's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 1.14% | 1.12% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.40% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDQ and IYW have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDQ has higher volatility (22.22%) compared to IYW (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs IYW's -81.90%.
On 1-year performance, IYW leads with 37.18% vs -52.54% for NVDQ. On fees, IYW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYW has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYW has performed better with a 37.18% return vs -52.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDQ.
NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.11% for IYW.
NVDQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while IYW is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDQ and 0.38% for IYW.
IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDQ and IYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer