PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYW vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYW vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYW achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, IYW has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 24.40%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 33.99% annualized return.


IYW

1D
2.37%
1M
0.08%
6M
22.15%
YTD
22.12%
1Y
37.66%
3Y*
31.14%
5Y*
18.81%
10Y*
24.40%
ALL TIME*
9.25%

SMH

1D
0.91%
1M
-7.91%
6M
33.70%
YTD
51.46%
1Y
92.69%
3Y*
53.04%
5Y*
32.99%
10Y*
33.99%
ALL TIME*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$120.59M$130.00M$189.60M
$8.29B$7.23B$7.12B

IYW vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
22.12%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%35.44%47.45%46.64%-0.93%36.60%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
51.46%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IYW and SMH is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000

0.86

The correlation between IYW and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYW vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYW vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYWSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.79

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

15.18

-8.94

IYW vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYW Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYW and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYW vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYW drawdown since its inception was -81.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYW and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYWSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.90%

-84.96%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.81%

-24.62%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.47%

-35.74%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.44%

-45.30%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

-45.30%

+5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-18.46%

+12.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.47%

-40.89%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

6.13%

-0.09%

Volatility

IYW vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is 7.98%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that IYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYWSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

14.15%

-6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

32.94%

-13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.82%

38.50%

-14.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.50%

36.51%

-10.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.37%

33.33%

-7.96%

IYW vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYW vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

IYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SMH's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.11%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.20%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYW and SMH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to IYW (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYW dropped -81.90% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 33.99% vs 24.40% for IYW. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYW has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 33.99% return vs 24.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYW.

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.11% for IYW.

IYW is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYW and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYW and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer