IYW vs. XLK
IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IYW tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYW returned 26.22%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for XLK. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IYW charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IYW vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYW achieves a 30.23% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 37.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYW having a 26.22% annualized return and XLK not far behind at 25.97%.
IYW
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 30.23%
- 6M
- 29.45%
- 1Y
- 63.02%
- 3Y*
- 35.66%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 26.22%
XLK
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 22.45%
- YTD
- 37.85%
- 6M
- 37.41%
- 1Y
- 71.15%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 24.55%
- 10Y*
- 25.97%
IYW vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 30.23% | 25.38% | 30.25% | 65.44% | -34.83% | 35.44% | 47.45% | 46.64% | -0.93% | 36.60% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 37.85% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYW and XLK is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IYW and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYW vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IYW
XLK
IYW vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.16 | 3.44 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.87 | 4.12 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.55 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.56 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 15.32 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16 | 3.44 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.99 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.42 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IYW vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYW drawdown since its inception was -81.90%, roughly equal to the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYW and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.90% | -82.05% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -15.92% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -25.66% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.44% | -33.56% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.44% | -33.56% | -5.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -34.96% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 4.74% | +0.69% |
Volatility
IYW vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is 6.11%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that IYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 6.74% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | 16.64% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 20.80% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 24.90% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 24.49% | +0.61% |
IYW vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYW vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 1.14% | 1.12% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, IYW and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XLK has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to IYW (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYW dropped -81.90% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, IYW leads with 26.22% vs 25.97% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IYW has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYW has performed better with a 26.22% return vs 25.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYW.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.10% for IYW.
IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYW and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYW and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer