PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDQ vs. DOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVDQ vs. DOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVDQ vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
4.46%-74.63%-93.80%-30.70%
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
4.40%-8.40%-5.62%-10.26%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NVDQ having a 4.46% return and DOG slightly lower at 4.40%.


NVDQ

1D
-11.16%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
4.46%
6M
-4.52%
1Y
-76.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOG

1D
-2.44%
1M
5.84%
YTD
4.40%
6M
1.88%
1Y
-6.66%
3Y*
-5.84%
5Y*
-4.72%
10Y*
-10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVDQ vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

DOG
DOG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDQDOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.93

-0.40

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.69

-0.45

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.94

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.34

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.02

-0.46

-0.56

NVDQ vs. DOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the DOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and DOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDQDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

-0.40

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

-0.55

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and DOG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NVDQ vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than DOG's 3.21% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.25%0.26%4.59%11.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
3.21%3.65%5.72%4.54%0.41%0.00%0.14%1.54%0.86%0.04%

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, which is greater than DOG's maximum drawdown of -92.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and DOG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDQDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.13%

-92.59%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.00%

-22.70%

-62.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.94%

-91.95%

-6.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.41%

-66.16%

-21.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.44%

16.48%

+57.96%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a higher volatility of 20.96% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 5.00%. This indicates that NVDQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDQDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.96%

5.00%

+15.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.99%

9.24%

+42.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.28%

16.82%

+65.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.83%

14.73%

+82.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.83%

17.46%

+79.37%