NVDQ vs. CRCD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDQ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.

Performance

NVDQ vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -25.89% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -81.32% return.

NVDQ

• 1D: 3.06%
• 1M: 14.12%
• YTD: -25.89%
• 6M: -24.18%
• 1Y: -56.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRCD

• 1D: 6.12%
• 1M: 92.79%
• YTD: -81.32%
• 6M: -79.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDQ vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-25.89%	-17.43%
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	-81.32%	38.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and CRCD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CRCD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDQ	CRCD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	—	—

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and CRCD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDQ	CRCD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.45%	-96.95%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.25%	-91.14%	-8.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.32%	-57.66%	-30.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVDQ	CRCD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.34%	200.33%	-129.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.32%	200.33%	-105.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.32%	200.33%	-105.01%

NVDQ vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDQ vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.35%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDQ and CRCD in my portfolio?

NVDQ and CRCD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVDQ or CRCD?

On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDQ or CRCD?

NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDQ or CRCD?

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.

What is the main difference between NVDQ and CRCD?

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDQ and 1.50% for CRCD.