CRCD vs. TSLT
CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) and TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Tesla, Inc. (200%). CRCD is actively managed, while TSLT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. CRCD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLT.
Performance
CRCD vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -80.82% return, which is significantly lower than TSLT's -35.75% return.
CRCD
- 1D
- 9.65%
- 1M
- 25.76%
- 6M
- -78.50%
- YTD
- -80.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLT
- 1D
- -6.38%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -34.90%
- YTD
- -35.75%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -80.82% | 38.83% |
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -35.75% | 2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCD and TSLT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCD vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLT
CRCD vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCD | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCD vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than TSLT's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and TSLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCD | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.95% | -83.16% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.91% | -68.79% | -22.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.54% | -50.94% | -8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.88% | — |
Volatility
CRCD vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCD | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 201.32% | 89.33% | +111.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 201.32% | 117.20% | +84.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 201.32% | 117.20% | +84.12% |
CRCD vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLT's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCD vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRCD nor TSLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCD and TSLT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
CRCD and TSLT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CRCD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSLT is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 1.05% for TSLT.
Find the right allocation for CRCD and TSLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer