PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCD vs. ROBN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRCD vs. ROBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -85.83% return, which is significantly lower than ROBN's -37.23% return.


CRCD

1D
0.41%
1M
69.10%
YTD
-85.83%
6M
-83.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROBN

1D
-4.80%
1M
92.55%
YTD
-37.23%
6M
-46.95%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCD vs. ROBN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRCD
T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF
-85.83%38.83%
ROBN
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF
-37.23%-29.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCD and ROBN is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025

-0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCD vs. ROBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ROBN
ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCD vs. ROBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRCDROBNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

CRCD vs. ROBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRCD vs. ROBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than ROBN's maximum drawdown of -86.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and ROBN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCDROBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.95%

-86.84%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.28%

-70.69%

-22.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-44.25%

-12.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.66%

Volatility

CRCD vs. ROBN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCDROBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.97%

140.33%

+60.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

200.97%

152.09%

+48.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

200.97%

152.09%

+48.88%

CRCD vs. ROBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBN's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRCD vs. ROBN - Dividend Comparison

CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRCD and ROBN have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ROBN is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROBN is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.

CRCD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ROBN is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 1.05% for ROBN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCD and ROBN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer