NVD vs. QLD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). NVD is actively managed, while QLD is passively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -49.89% vs 48.13% for QLD. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

NVD vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -33.57% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 25.90% return.

NVD

• 1D: 4.40%
• 1M: -2.86%
• 6M: -33.00%
• YTD: -33.57%
• 1Y: -49.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: -3.32%
• 1M: -7.16%
• 6M: 23.22%
• YTD: 25.90%
• 1Y: 48.13%
• 3Y*: 37.48%
• 5Y*: 19.69%
• 10Y*: 33.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVD vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-33.57%	-73.27%	-93.09%	-15.28%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	25.90%	30.36%	42.82%	23.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and QLD is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	-0.70

The correlation between NVD and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

NVD vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVD	QLD
Technology	199.6%	58.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

NVD vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 44
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVD vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVD	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	1.30	-2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.82	1.78	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.23	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	1.92	-2.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	6.24	-7.77

NVD vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVD vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVD	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.26%	-83.13%	-16.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.41%	-25.13%	-35.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.11%	-11.84%	-87.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.23%	-18.11%	-64.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.69%	7.73%	+24.96%

Volatility

NVD vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 22.59% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 14.98%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVD	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.59%	14.98%	+7.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.39%	30.86%	+25.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.85%	37.22%	+34.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.20%	45.59%	+46.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.20%	44.86%	+47.34%

NVD vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVD vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.80%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	17.80%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVD and QLD in my portfolio?

NVD and QLD have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVD or QLD?

NVD has higher volatility (22.59%) compared to QLD (14.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, NVD or QLD?

On 1-year performance, QLD leads with 48.13% vs -49.89% for NVD. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 14.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVD or QLD?

Over the 1-year period, QLD has performed better with a 48.13% return vs -49.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVD or QLD?

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVD or QLD?

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 17.80%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between NVD and QLD?

NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.