NVD vs. NVDA
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) is Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, NVD returned -45.67% vs 15.71% for NVDA. Their -1.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
NVD vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -30.21% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.77% return.
NVD
- 1D
- -5.85%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- 6M
- -25.85%
- YTD
- -30.21%
- 1Y
- -45.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -78.48%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $448.34M | $392.73M | $345.88M | |
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B |
NVD vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -30.21% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and NVDA is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -1.00 |
The correlation between NVD and NVDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
NVDA
NVD vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVD | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 0.65 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 1.32 | -2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVD vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -89.72% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.80% | -20.21% | -39.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.06% | -14.74% | -84.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -36.07% | -46.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.25% | 9.90% | +23.35% |
Volatility
NVD vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.19% | 12.04% | +12.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.44% | 28.30% | +29.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.16% | 36.41% | +36.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.05% | 51.87% | +40.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.05% | 49.95% | +42.10% |
Dividends
NVD vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.95%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 16.95% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and NVDA have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer