NVD vs. VOO
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. NVD is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -65.26% vs 27.14% for VOO. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
NVD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -33.57% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.07% return.
NVD
- 1D
- -5.57%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- -33.57%
- 6M
- -37.58%
- 1Y
- -65.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 27.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
NVD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -33.57% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.07% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 9.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and VOO is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.63 |
The correlation between NVD and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.63 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
NVD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVD
VOO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
NVD
VOO
Basic Materials
NVD
-
VOO
Communication Services
NVD
-
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
NVD
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
NVD
-
VOO
Energy
NVD
-
VOO
Financial Services
NVD
-
VOO
Healthcare
NVD
-
VOO
Industrials
NVD
-
VOO
Real Estate
NVD
-
VOO
Utilities
NVD
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
VOO
NVD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.39 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 3.02 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 13.61 | -14.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -33.99% | -65.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.11% | -8.90% | -62.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.11% | -1.45% | -97.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.81% | -3.68% | -78.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.95% | 1.97% | +44.98% |
Volatility
NVD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 25.86% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.69%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.86% | 4.69% | +21.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.54% | 9.79% | +44.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.75% | 12.37% | +58.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.56% | 16.90% | +75.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.56% | 18.05% | +74.51% |
NVD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.80%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 17.80% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and VOO have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (25.86%) compared to VOO (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 27.14% vs -65.26% for NVD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 27.14% return vs -65.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 17.80%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer