NUVB vs. CTMX
NUVB (Nuvation Bio Inc.) and CTMX (CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, NUVB returned -17.37%/yr vs -13.81%/yr for CTMX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUVB vs. CTMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUVB achieves a -47.32% return, which is significantly lower than CTMX's -24.41% return.
NUVB
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- -47.32%
- 6M
- -43.61%
- 1Y
- 92.65%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- -17.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CTMX
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -22.97%
- YTD
- -24.41%
- 6M
- -19.50%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- -13.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.44%
NUVB vs. CTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc. | -47.32% | 236.84% | 76.16% | -21.35% | -77.41% | -27.35% | 17.00% |
CTMX CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. | -24.41% | 313.59% | -33.55% | -3.13% | -63.05% | -33.89% | -4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUVB and CTMX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2020 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
NUVB:
$1.78B
CTMX:
$570.82M
NUVB:
-$0.42
CTMX:
-$0.37
NUVB:
11.59
CTMX:
14.53
NUVB:
5.58
CTMX:
1.78
NUVB:
$143.05M
CTMX:
$35.54M
NUVB:
$131.08M
CTMX:
$24.77M
NUVB:
-$139.03M
CTMX:
-$62.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUVB vs. CTMX — Risk / Return Rank
NUVB
CTMX
NUVB vs. CTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) and CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUVB | CTMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.14 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 0.41 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 0.91 | +2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUVB | CTMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.22 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | -0.10 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | -0.11 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
NUVB vs. CTMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUVB drawdown since its inception was -93.39%, smaller than the maximum CTMX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUVB and CTMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUVB | CTMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.39% | -98.74% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.55% | -53.19% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.19% | -91.59% | +33.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.88% | -94.16% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.60% | -90.59% | +22.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.50% | -70.69% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.33% | 23.71% | +7.62% |
Volatility
NUVB vs. CTMX - Volatility Comparison
Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) has a higher volatility of 18.34% compared to CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) at 13.80%. This indicates that NUVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUVB | CTMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.34% | 13.80% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.92% | 68.42% | -15.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.39% | 96.69% | -5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.57% | 141.79% | -66.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.03% | 111.36% | -38.33% |
Dividends
NUVB vs. CTMX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NUVB nor CTMX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NUVB vs. CTMX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nuvation Bio Inc. and CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NUVB and CTMX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUVB has higher volatility (18.34%) compared to CTMX (13.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUVB dropped -93.39% vs CTMX's -98.74%.
NUVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUVB and CTMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer