CTMX vs. DNN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN).

Performance

CTMX vs. DNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTMX vs. DNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTMX CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.	10.33%	313.59%	-33.55%	-3.13%	-63.05%	-33.89%	-21.18%	-44.97%	-28.47%	92.08%
DNN Denison Mines Corp	32.71%	47.78%	1.69%	53.91%	-16.06%	111.75%	54.05%	-9.48%	-15.64%	6.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTMX : $799.88M DNN : $3.18B
EPS CTMX : -$0.11 DNN : -$0.24
PS Ratio CTMX : 9.55 DNN : 646.45
PB Ratio CTMX : 8.08 DNN : 8.65
Total Revenue (TTM) CTMX : $76.20M DNN : $4.92M
Gross Profit (TTM) CTMX : $75.69M DNN : -$23.92M
EBITDA (TTM) CTMX : -$19.39M DNN : -$171.24M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTMX achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than DNN's 32.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CTMX has underperformed DNN with an annualized return of -9.91%, while DNN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.22% annualized return.

CTMX

• 1D: 6.58%
• 1M: -12.48%
• YTD: 10.33%
• 6M: 47.34%
• 1Y: 639.23%
• 3Y*: 46.01%
• 5Y*: -9.80%
• 10Y*: -9.91%

DNN

• 1D: 6.97%
• 1M: -15.55%
• YTD: 32.71%
• 6M: 28.36%
• 1Y: 171.54%
• 3Y*: 47.95%
• 5Y*: 24.50%
• 10Y*: 20.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTMX vs. DNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTMX

CTMX Risk / Return Rank: 98
CTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

DNN

DNN Risk / Return Rank: 93
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTMX vs. DNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTMX	DNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.81	2.72	+1.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.71	3.11	+1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.37	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.76	5.61	+10.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	36.65	15.68	+20.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTMX vs. DNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the DNN Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTMX and DNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTMX	DNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81	2.72	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.38	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	0.32	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	-0.07	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between CTMX and DNN is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTMX vs. DNN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTMX nor DNN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CTMX vs. DNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTMX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, roughly equal to the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTMX and DNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTMX	DNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.74%	-98.96%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.14%	-29.50%	-11.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.65%	-55.66%	-39.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.74%	-75.90%	-22.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.27%	-81.69%	-4.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.40%	-85.10%	+14.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.69%	10.55%	+7.14%

Volatility

CTMX vs. DNN - Volatility Comparison

CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) has a higher volatility of 53.47% compared to Denison Mines Corp (DNN) at 20.08%. This indicates that CTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTMX	DNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.47%	20.08%	+33.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.27%	45.53%	+28.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	169.33%	63.51%	+105.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	142.15%	64.41%	+77.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.35%	64.17%	+47.18%

Financials