NUVB vs. FPBFX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX).

FPBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 1, 1986.

Performance

NUVB vs. FPBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NUVB vs. FPBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc.	-49.67%	236.84%	76.16%	-21.35%	-77.41%	-27.35%	17.00%
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	4.80%	37.15%	9.26%	14.07%	-23.71%	2.28%	18.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUVB achieves a -49.67% return, which is significantly lower than FPBFX's 4.80% return.

NUVB

• 1D: 5.13%
• 1M: -22.77%
• YTD: -49.67%
• 6M: 21.89%
• 1Y: 157.71%
• 3Y*: 39.54%
• 5Y*: -15.06%
• 10Y*: —

FPBFX

• 1D: 4.02%
• 1M: -6.88%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.92%
• 1Y: 38.92%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 6.30%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NUVB vs. FPBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUVB

NUVB Risk / Return Rank: 84
NUVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
NUVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
NUVB Omega Ratio Rank: 85
NUVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NUVB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FPBFX

FPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUVB vs. FPBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUVB	FPBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.84	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.40	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	2.87	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.64	10.85	-4.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUVB vs. FPBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUVB Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the FPBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUVB and FPBFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUVB	FPBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.84	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.34	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.42	-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between NUVB and FPBFX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NUVB vs. FPBFX - Dividend Comparison

NUVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	7.82%	8.19%	5.99%	5.36%	8.76%	14.97%	4.45%	0.75%	10.88%	4.36%	2.38%	3.61%

Drawdowns

NUVB vs. FPBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUVB drawdown since its inception was -93.39%, which is greater than FPBFX's maximum drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUVB and FPBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUVB	FPBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.39%	-69.06%	-24.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.55%	-13.21%	-44.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.35%	-37.97%	-55.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.05%	-8.72%	-60.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.43%	-17.65%	-47.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.53%	3.49%	+20.04%

Volatility

NUVB vs. FPBFX - Volatility Comparison

Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) at 10.35%. This indicates that NUVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUVB	FPBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.34%	10.35%	+5.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.18%	16.09%	+53.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.04%	21.62%	+73.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.00%	18.80%	+57.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.56%	17.50%	+56.06%