NUKZ vs. IMMR
NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while IMMR (Immersion Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 5.48% vs -14.13% for IMMR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUKZ vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's -2.12% return.
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.65%
IMMR
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- -14.13%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.17%
NUKZ vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | -1.84% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | -2.12% | -18.30% | 25.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKZ and IMMR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKZ vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank
NUKZ
IMMR
NUKZ vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKZ | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.97 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | -0.56 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -1.22 | +1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKZ vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and IMMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKZ | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -98.66% | +65.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.23% | -25.48% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.23% | -89.91% | +71.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -88.21% | +81.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 15.11% | -7.28% |
Volatility
NUKZ vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) is 6.47%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that NUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKZ | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 11.39% | -4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.01% | 27.95% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.55% | 40.69% | -10.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 45.82% | -13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 50.93% | -18.28% |
Dividends
NUKZ vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison
NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than IMMR's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 4.90% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKZ and IMMR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to NUKZ (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs IMMR's -98.66%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUKZ and IMMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer