NUDG vs. NUMG
NUDG (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class) and NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDG is a Dividend fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. NUDG is actively managed, while NUMG is passively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NUDG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUMG.
Performance
NUDG vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUDG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NUMG
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- -7.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- -1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.41 | $455.53 | $412.95K | |
| $561.88K | $671.35K | $1.08M |
NUDG vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.95% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDG and NUMG is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDG vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank
NUDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUMG
NUDG vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUDG | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.95 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUDG vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and NUMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDG | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -38.85% | +36.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -12.63% | +12.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -11.37% | +10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.02% | — |
Volatility
NUDG vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDG | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 18.87% | -8.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.91% | 22.97% | -13.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.91% | 21.81% | -11.90% |
NUDG vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUDG vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison
NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 12.76% | 3.82% | 0.27% | 5.14% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUDG and NUMG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for NUDG.
NUDG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.
NUDG is categorized as Dividend, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.30% for NUMG.
Find the right allocation for NUDG and NUMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer