NUDG vs. NUMG
NUDG (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class) and NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDG is a Dividend fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. NUDG is actively managed, while NUMG is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUDG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUMG.
Performance
NUDG vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUDG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUMG
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- —
NUDG vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.41% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDG and NUMG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDG vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank
NUDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUMG
NUDG vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUDG | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.98 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUDG vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and NUMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDG | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -38.85% | +36.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -10.66% | +10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -11.37% | +10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility
NUDG vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDG | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 18.74% | -7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 22.97% | -12.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 21.85% | -11.06% |
NUDG vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUDG vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison
NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 12.76% | 3.82% | 0.27% | 5.14% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUDG and NUMG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for NUDG.
NUDG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.
NUDG is categorized as Dividend, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.30% for NUMG.
Find the right allocation for NUDG and NUMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer