NUMG vs. XJH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while XJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUMG returned -0.91%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for XJH. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NUMG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XJH.

Performance

NUMG vs. XJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -5.49% return, which is significantly lower than XJH's 15.53% return.

NUMG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: -5.49%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: -3.64%
• 3Y*: 6.44%
• 5Y*: -0.91%
• 10Y*: —

XJH

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 15.53%
• 6M: 13.02%
• 1Y: 28.80%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMG vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-5.49%	0.78%	11.99%	20.47%	-28.31%	12.27%	26.01%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	15.53%	8.12%	12.27%	16.74%	-14.36%	23.43%	29.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and XJH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020	0.82

The correlation between NUMG and XJH shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUMG vs. XJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUMG	XJH
Technology	33.4%	16.7%
Industrials	24.6%	26.8%
Healthcare	13.5%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.6%
Financial Services	6.4%	14.0%
Communication Services	5.2%	1.1%
Real Estate	3.1%	8.1%
Basic Materials	2.0%	5.0%
Utilities	1.2%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.2%
Energy	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

NUMG vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMG

NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 7
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XJH

XJH Risk / Return Rank: 56
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMG vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUMG	XJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	1.74	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	2.52	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.30	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	3.01	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	11.09	-11.56

NUMG vs. XJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the XJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and XJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than XJH's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and XJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUMG	XJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.85%	-25.07%	-13.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.71%	-9.61%	-10.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.58%	-24.56%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.85%	-25.07%	-13.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.97%	0.00%	-13.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-6.77%	-4.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.76%	2.60%	+5.16%

Volatility

NUMG vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) at 4.74%. This indicates that NUMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUMG	XJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	4.74%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.15%	12.31%	+2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.66%	16.65%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.94%	19.96%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.87%	19.87%	+2.00%

NUMG vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XJH's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUMG vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XJH's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.06%	0.18%	0.18%	12.76%	3.82%	0.27%	5.14%	0.56%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.08%	1.24%	1.24%	1.38%	1.45%	1.04%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUMG and XJH in my portfolio?

NUMG and XJH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUMG or XJH?

NUMG has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to XJH (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMG dropped -38.85% vs XJH's -25.07%.

Which ETF is better, NUMG or XJH?

On 5-year performance, XJH leads with 8.33% vs -0.91% for NUMG. On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUMG or XJH?

Over the 5-year period, XJH has performed better with a 8.33% return vs -0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUMG or XJH?

XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUMG or XJH?

XJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

What is the main difference between NUMG and XJH?

NUMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth, while XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUMG and 0.12% for XJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.