NUCG.L vs. NUKZ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ).
NUCG.L and NUKZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUCG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. Both NUCG.L and NUKZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 11.27% | 56.08% | 20.62% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 5.84% | 56.57% | 62.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 5.84% return.
NUCG.L
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 107.16%
- 3Y*
- 44.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUKZ
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- 5.84%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 75.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUCG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
NUCG.L
NUKZ
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUCG.L | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.38 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 3.06 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 4.72 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 12.40 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUCG.L | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.38 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.78 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUCG.L and NUKZ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
NUCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.86% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.36%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and NUKZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUCG.L | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.36% | -33.03% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | -16.51% | -10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.63% | -9.62% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -6.10% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.32% | 6.28% | +4.04% |
Volatility
NUCG.L vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 9.47%. This indicates that NUCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUCG.L | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 9.47% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.69% | 21.64% | +9.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.17% | 31.77% | +9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.82% | 32.60% | +4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.82% | 32.60% | +4.22% |