NUCG.L vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
NUCG.L and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUCG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both NUCG.L and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUCG.L or URA.
Key characteristics
| NUCG.L | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.54% | 14.55% |
| 1Y Return | 62.80% | 67.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.65 | 2.25 |
| Daily Std Dev | 38.04% | 32.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.42% | -93.54% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.72% | -66.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUCG.L and URA is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NUCG.L vs. URA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 14.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUCG.L vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUCG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUCG.L vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NUCG.L vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
NUCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 5.30% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
NUCG.L vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -20.42%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NUCG.L vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) is 8.37%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that NUCG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.