NUCG.L vs. URNP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L).
NUCG.L and URNP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUCG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. URNP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD. It was launched on May 3, 2022. Both NUCG.L and URNP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 9.19% | 56.08% | 31.87% | 19.75% |
URNP.L HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc | 19.82% | 43.05% | -13.51% | 38.60% |
Different Trading Currencies
NUCG.L is traded in USD, while URNP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the URNP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than URNP.L's 19.82% return.
NUCG.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 104.36%
- 3Y*
- 43.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URNP.L
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 32.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUCG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than URNP.L's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L — Risk / Return Rank
NUCG.L
URNP.L
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUCG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.34 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 2.82 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 4.70 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.05 | 11.76 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUCG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.34 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.50 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUCG.L and URNP.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NUCG.L nor URNP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.36%, smaller than the maximum URNP.L drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and URNP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUCG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.36% | -51.01% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | -23.65% | -3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -15.54% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -17.93% | +8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 9.26% | +1.09% |
Volatility
NUCG.L vs. URNP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) is 11.82%, while HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) has a volatility of 14.29%. This indicates that NUCG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUCG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.82% | 14.29% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.67% | 37.57% | -6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.20% | 47.64% | -6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.82% | 41.33% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.82% | 41.33% | -4.51% |