NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L).
NUCG.L and HMCA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUCG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. HMCA.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jul 27, 2018. Both NUCG.L and HMCA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 11.27% | 56.08% | 31.87% | 19.75% |
HMCA.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | -0.54% | 26.23% | 11.59% | -19.54% |
Different Trading Currencies
NUCG.L is traded in USD, while HMCA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HMCA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than HMCA.L's -0.54% return.
NUCG.L
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 107.16%
- 3Y*
- 44.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMCA.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.23%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUCG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HMCA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L — Risk / Return Rank
NUCG.L
HMCA.L
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUCG.L | HMCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.48 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 1.94 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 2.64 | +1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 10.18 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUCG.L | HMCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.48 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.23 | +0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUCG.L and HMCA.L is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L - Dividend Comparison
NUCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMCA.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | 1.85% | 1.76% | 1.97% | 2.20% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 0.88% | 1.78% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.36%, smaller than the maximum HMCA.L drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and HMCA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUCG.L | HMCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.36% | -44.23% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | -9.21% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.63% | -16.96% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -18.09% | +9.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.32% | 2.72% | +7.60% |
Volatility
NUCG.L vs. HMCA.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that NUCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMCA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUCG.L | HMCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 4.55% | +7.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.69% | 11.08% | +19.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.17% | 17.25% | +23.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.82% | 22.69% | +14.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.82% | 24.04% | +12.78% |