NUCG.L vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
NUCG.L and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUCG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both NUCG.L and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUCG.L or QQQ.
Key characteristics
| NUCG.L | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.26% | 7.83% |
| 1Y Return | 59.91% | 36.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.58 | 2.34 |
| Daily Std Dev | 38.37% | 16.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.42% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.96% | -1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUCG.L and QQQ is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NUCG.L vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 23.26% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 7.83% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUCG.L vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUCG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUCG.L vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NUCG.L vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
NUCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.60% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
NUCG.L vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -20.42%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NUCG.L vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.71%. This indicates that NUCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.