PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUCG.L vs. BAESY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUCG.L vs. BAESY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than BAESY's 11.25% return.


NUCG.L

1D
3.48%
1M
-10.44%
YTD
2.96%
6M
-1.20%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
36.37%
5Y*
10Y*

BAESY

1D
-4.00%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
30.61%
10Y*
18.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUCG.L vs. BAESY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NUCG.L
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF
2.96%56.10%31.89%0.05%
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
11.25%65.51%1.23%43.79%

Correlation

The correlation between NUCG.L and BAESY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUCG.L vs. BAESY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUCG.L
NUCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NUCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUCG.L vs. BAESY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUCG.LBAESYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.03

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

0.02

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

0.04

+2.24

NUCG.L vs. BAESY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUCG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the BAESY Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUCG.L and BAESY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUCG.L vs. BAESY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum BAESY drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and BAESY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUCG.LBAESYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-59.20%

+23.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.65%

-23.59%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.35%

-23.59%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.00%

-16.92%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-19.32%

+8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.10%

10.17%

+1.93%

Volatility

NUCG.L vs. BAESY - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) at 10.68%. This indicates that NUCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUCG.LBAESYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.56%

10.68%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.37%

25.10%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.94%

31.92%

+8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.38%

28.12%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.38%

27.90%

+6.48%

Dividends

NUCG.L vs. BAESY - Dividend Comparison

NUCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.90%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
NUCG.L
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUCG.L and BAESY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUCG.L and BAESY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer