NU vs. CME
NU (Nu Holdings Ltd.) and CME (CME Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — NU in Banks - Diversified, CME in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges. Over the past 3 years, NU returned 15.70%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for CME. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NU vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a -30.70% return, which is significantly lower than CME's -5.50% return.
NU
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -15.94%
- YTD
- -30.70%
- 6M
- -30.20%
- 1Y
- -4.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CME
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -5.50%
- 6M
- -4.13%
- 1Y
- -4.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.50%
NU vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | -30.70% | 61.58% | 24.37% | 104.67% | -56.61% | -9.20% |
CME CME Group Inc. | -5.50% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NU and CME is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.07 |
The correlation between NU and CME shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NU:
$56.96B
CME:
$91.54B
NU:
$0.65
CME:
$11.75
NU:
17.87
CME:
21.45
NU:
0.27
CME:
1.87
NU:
3.24
CME:
13.46
NU:
4.52
CME:
3.44
NU:
$17.54B
CME:
$6.76B
NU:
$7.67B
CME:
$5.84B
NU:
$4.14B
CME:
$5.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NU vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
NU
CME
NU vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NU | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.21 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | -0.72 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NU | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | -0.23 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.59 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
NU vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum CME drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and CME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NU | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.07% | -77.50% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.17% | -21.42% | -16.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.58% | -21.42% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.17% | -20.95% | -17.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.77% | -20.69% | -9.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.69% | 6.35% | +8.34% |
Volatility
NU vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a higher volatility of 14.24% compared to CME Group Inc. (CME) at 10.21%. This indicates that NU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NU | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.24% | 10.21% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.87% | 16.89% | +11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.10% | 20.38% | +18.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.43% | 20.06% | +38.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.43% | 23.89% | +34.54% |
Dividends
NU vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
NU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.44% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NU vs. CME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NU vs. CME - Profitability Comparison
NU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
NU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.7%.
NU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 61.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NU and CME have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NU has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to CME (10.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NU dropped -72.07% vs CME's -77.50%.
NU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NU and CME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer